Yuniana, Anggie Fikti (2016) AN ERROR ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ ENGLISH WRITING (A Descriptive Qualitative Study on the Fifth Semester of English Education Study Program of Educational Sciences and Teachers’Training Faculty of Peradaban University in the Academic Year 2015/2016). Bachelor thesis, Universitas Peradaban.

Preview	Text 40112012_COVER.pdf Download (43kB) | Preview
	Text 40112012_CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2017. Download (28kB)
	Text 40112012_CHAPTER II.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2017. Download (58kB)
	Text 40112012_CHAPTER III.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2017. Download (23kB)
	Text 40112012_CHAPTER IV.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2017. Download (144kB)
	Text 40112012_CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2017. Download (20kB)
	Text 40112012_Appendices.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only until 31 December 2017. Download (2MB)

Abstract

This study was carried out to find out the most common types of errors and the sources of errors in writing recount text made by the fifth semester students of English Education Study Program of Educational Sciences and Teachers’ Training Faculty of Peradaban University in the academicyear 2015/ 2016. The method used in this study was a descriptive qualitative research. The data were analyzed using error analysis method. The error types were classified based on Azar’s theory. The sources of errors were found out based on Brown’s theory. The result of the study showed that there were the highest-three and the lowest-three errors made by the students. The highest-three common errors wereverb tense with the number that was 222 or 29.8% errors, add a word with the number that was 109 or 14.6% errors and word choice with the number that was 84 or 11.3% errors. The lowest-three errors were2 or 0.3% run on sentence errors, 5 or 0.7%incomplete sentence errors and 13 or 1.7% article errors. Based on the total result types of errors, the writer found that the number of total source of errors were intralingual transfer had305 or 40.9% source of errors, interlingual transfer which had196 or 26.3% source of errors,communication strategy which had 194 or 26.0% source of errors, and context of learning which had50 or 6.7% source of errors

Actions (login required)

View Item